:: NEWS COCKTAIL aka BlahBlahBlog ::

"Everything is being compressed into tiny tablets. You take a little pill of news every day - 23 minutes - and that's supposed to be enough." -Walter Cronkite, RE TV news. The Web has changed that for many, however, and here is an extra dose for your daily news cocktail. This prescription tends to include surveillance and now war-related links, along with the occasional pop culture junk and whatever else seizes my attention as I scan online news sites.
:: welcome to NEWS COCKTAIL aka BlahBlahBlog :: home | me ::
01.03 / 02.03 / 03.03 / 04.03 / 05.03 / 06.03 / 07.03 / 08.03 / 09.03 / 10.03 / 11.03 / 12.03 / 01.04 / 02.04 / 03.04 / 04.04 / 05.04 / 06.04 / 07.04 / 08.04 / 09.04 / 10.04 / 11.04 / 12.04 / 01.05 / 02.05 / 03.05 / 04.05 / 05.05 / 06.05 / 07.05 / 08.05 / 09.05 / 10.05 / 11.05 / 12.05 / 02.06 / 03.06 / 04.06 / 05.06 / 06.06 / 07.06 / 08.06 / 09.06 / 10.06 / 12.06 / 01.07 / 02.07 / 03.07 / 04.07 / 05.07 / 06.07 / 07.07 / 08.07 / 09.07 / 11.07 / 12.07 / 01.08 / 02.08 / 04.08 / 05.08 / 07.08 / 08.08 / 09.08 / 10.08 / 11.08 / 12.08 / 01.09 / 03.09 / 06.09 / 08.09 / 09.09 / 11.09 / 12.09 / 01.10 / 04.10 / 05.10 / 09.10 / 10.10 / 11.10 / 02.11 / 04.11 / 05.11 / 07.11 / 04.13 /
[::..archive..::]
[::..What's all this then?..::]
"News is the first rough draft of history." -Philip L. Graham
[::..news to me..::]
:: google news [>]
:: wired news [>]
:: it news [>]
:: more it news [>]
:: nerd news [>]
:: media news [>]
:: art news [>]
:: the news [>]
:: other news [>]
[::..other blogs..::]
:: buffy [>]
:: meg [>]
:: places for writers [>]
:: wanna write? [>]
:: collaborative learning [>]
:: web weirdness [>]
:: digitalbutterfly [>]
:: runwithscissors [>]
:: synkronisiteez [>]
:: loopy librarian [>]
:: jen speaks [>]
:: russian beauty [>]
:: dave barry! [>]
:: douglas rushkoff [>]
:: this girl thinks [>]
:: radio free nation [>]
:: privacy digest [>]
:: pudding time [>]
:: dania's dailies [>]
:: straight on til morning [>]
:: a blog by any other name [>]
:: a mad-tea party [>]
:: nietzscheswife [>]
:: bloggy mountain breakdown [>]
:: linkfilter [>]
:: slingshot group [>]
:: a blog apart [>]
:: anti-blog [>]
:: destroy all blogs [>]
:: the world ends @ 9, pictures @ 11 [>]
:: notes from the overground [>]
:: the end of free [>]
:: started the same day as this [>]
[::..other things..::]
:: myelin: blogging ecosystem [>]
:: alternative tentacles [>]
:: are we having fun yet? [>]
:: mail art [>]
:: the mail art interview project [>]
:: the postcard project [>]
:: found magazine [>]
:: chuck palahniuk [>]
:: bill hicks! [>]
:: chomsky archive [>]
:: association of alternative newsweeklies [>]
:: the nation [>]
:: alternet [>]
:: the smirking chimp [>]
:: plastic - recycling the web in real time [>]
:: open secrets [>]
:: william s. burroughs [>]
:: beautify your lunch - eat an artist [>]
:: bartleby [>]
:: disinformation [>]
:: imdb [>]
:: rotten tomatoes [>]
:: aboutcultfilm.com [>]
[::..random..::]
"Spending an evening on the World Wide Web is much like sitting down to a dinner of Cheetos, two hours later your fingers are yellow and you're no longer hungry, but you haven't been nourished." - Clifford Stoll

:: 6.30.2003 ::

:: Bloggers Gain Libel Protection ::

From Wired:

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last Tuesday that Web loggers, website operators and e-mail list editors can't be held responsible for libel for information they republish, extending crucial First Amendment protections to do-it-yourself online publishers.

Online free speech advocates praised the decision as a victory. The ruling effectively differentiates conventional news media, which can be sued relatively easily for libel, from certain forms of online communication such as moderated e-mail lists. One implication is that DIY publishers like bloggers cannot be sued as easily.

One-way news publications have editors and fact-checkers, and they're not just selling information -- they're selling reliability," said Cindy Cohn, legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "But on blogs or e-mail lists, people aren't necessarily selling anything, they're just engaging in speech. That freedom of speech wouldn't exist if you were held liable for every piece of information you cut, paste and forward."

The court based its decision on a section of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, or the CDA. That section states, "... no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." Three cases since then -- Zeran v. AOL, Gentry v. eBay and Schneider v. Amazon -- have granted immunity to commercial online service providers.

Tuesday's court ruling clarifies the reach of the immunity granted by the CDA to cover noncommercial publishers like list-serve operators and others who take a personal role in deleting or approving messages for online publication.

posted by me

:: 10:53:00 AM [+] ::
...

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?